Donald Trump’s war with Twitter keeps getting uglier

Hi it's Bill Palmer. I need your help! Please contribute $5 or more to help with Palmer Reportโ€™s ongoing operating expenses: Click Here

Trumpโ€™s war against Twitter might have destructive implications for other social media platforms, but thereโ€™s one that Trump very much wants to keep on his good side. Facebook.

For months, Twitter has been inching towards calling out Trumpโ€™s tweets when they include misinformation (which is pretty much always). On May 26, Twitter finally did it โ€” they labeled one of Trumpโ€™s tweets as โ€œpotentially misleading.โ€ Reflexively, Trump signed an executive order aimed at โ€œpreventing online censorship,โ€ but actually limited legal protections for social media companies. As NPR and the New Yorker note, experts say this is mostly just political theater and probably will not adversely affect the companies it targets, but it is nevertheless absurd, infantile, and worthy of derision.

Quick to come out and say that Facebook wouldnโ€™t be following in Twitterโ€™s footsteps was Mark Zuckerberg, on Fox News no less. Zuckerbergโ€™s bizarre obsession with being a techno-anarchist and Trumpโ€™s Facebook propaganda machine are a dangerous combination. Zuckerberg doesnโ€™t care about the consequences, and in coming out to Fox News about his disinterest in targeting misinformation, he effectively went up to Trump and told him face-to-face that heโ€™s safe. Zuckerberg said it in no uncertain terms: โ€œI just believe strongly that Facebook shouldnโ€™t be the arbiter of truth.”

But despite Zuckerbergโ€™s kowtowing to Trump, Twitter doubled down. On Friday, Twitter labeled one of Trumpโ€™s tweets as โ€œglorifying violence,โ€ which it very much did. In his tweet, Trump said โ€œwhen the looting starts, the shooting startsโ€ and threatened to send in the National Guard to control protests that have erupted in the wake of black American George Floydโ€™s murder at the hands of Minneapolis police.

What does all this mean for Trump and his relationship with Twitter and Facebook? Well, it looks like itโ€™s going to make the 2020 election interesting. Conservatives have already slammed Twitter for censoring Trumpโ€™s โ€œfree speechโ€ (read: hate speech and inciteful speech). It looks like Twitter wonโ€™t let Trump get away with eroding the truth any longer, and Trump might sever ties with the brand if it keeps neutering his bullshit proclamations.

Facebook, on the other hand, is quite different. Trump does well on Facebook. He buys many enormous numbers of ads on Facebook. This executive order, while probably toothless, flexes power that Zuckerberg wants to avoid. His interest is in keeping Facebook as profitable as possible, which means taking as much of Trumpโ€™s money as possible. They need each other. Without Trump, Facebook loses money, and without Facebook, Trump loses a propaganda outlet.

In sum: Expect to see escalations in Trumpโ€™s new social media assault and expect the consequences to transcend US borders. After all, election meddling is the new fad in town.

Hi it's Bill Palmer. I need your help! Please contribute $5 or more to help with Palmer Reportโ€™s ongoing operating expenses: Click Here